6 Comments
User's avatar
Luc Lelievre's avatar

How about considering both?

Expand full comment
nancy knox-bierman's avatar

My thoughts exactly!!

Expand full comment
bobby's avatar

Call me Wayne , Bob Martin need to talk about things important.

my story ramgbs.wordpress.com

Expand full comment
AE's avatar

Hi Wayne, I have been enjoying your informative articles, as well as your original book. I have a question regarding a different article (but I could not figure out how to comment there, so I'm writing here).

You wrote:

"Once the Sec’y of HHS lists the COVID vaccines as part of the NVICP, in the past with influenza and Hep A and B vaccines where added, an injured person or their estate/guardian has 2 years to file the claim with an 8 year “look-back” provision. Meaning if this process of listing the COVID vaccine as part of the NVICP happens in 2025, injured persons have 2 years from the listing date (2027) to file a claim for a COVID vaccine injury that occurred as far back as 2017. This procedure is only used for adding new vaccines to the program."

Can you explain more about the 2 years to file a claim versus the 8 year look-back, and how that relates to the standard 3 years statute of limitations normally given for vaccines covered in the NCVIP?

Thanks again for your meticulous reporting.

Expand full comment
Wayne A Rohde's avatar

Sec'y of HHS can add vaccine to NVICP. Then he can invoke the 2 year filing period, meaning all those who have been injured from the vax within the last 8 years, can file a claim in the NVICP. If this is done in 2025, anyone who has been injured fm the vax going back 8 years, will have 2 years to file by some time in 2027.

Expand full comment
bobby's avatar

Wayne lets talk important, Bob Martin Victoria bc Canada ramgbs.wordpress.com My or part of my story for all to read. Bob

Expand full comment