Our Government does not want to compensate for COVID-19 vaccine injury
HRSA budgets illustrate their true intentions
Since mid-September of 2021, Human Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) has one petition pending compensation from the CounterMeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) alleging an anaphylaxis reaction from the jab. Just one.
And they state this pending case on each month’s report of petitions filed in the CICP.
I have been thinking about how much will this petitioner receive in compensation. Being the first case to be compensated, it might serve as a harbinger for the thousands to follow.
We know from past HRSA statements and policy, the maximum payout is approx. $365,000. No pain and suffering added on. No future medical care which could cost tens of thousands to several million.
I sent a FOIA (Feb ‘22) to HRSA officials asking for budgets for staffing for FY 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024. Also asking for budgets for compensation for the same fiscal years.
I finally received a response. And it was truly amazing that I received some information instead of no response or data has been redacted or some other lame excuse.
So here it is.
The budget for compensation for the FY year 2022 is $931,936.00 which ends Sept 30, 2022. Not even 1 million dollars has been budgeted for compensation with over 8,800 petitions for injury filed during the COVID-era from declared countermeasures.
How can this be? Our government, more precisely, HRSA is planning to compensate only one possibly up to three petitions this year. In the NVICP, the estimated dollar amount for compensation in FY 2022 could be around $225 million for a projected 850 damage awards.
Comparing the NVICP payments to the HRSA budget for compensation, that is 0.44%.
So let’s look at FY 2023 which starts Oct 1, 2022 thru Sept 30, 2023.
The budget for compensation is increased. To only $5 million. HRSA knew last year the number of petitions would increase, yet they increased their budget by a factor of five.
I have seen in the NVICP, damage awards this large for one case. Future medical care is very expensive, especially for injury to a child.
Our government is in the business of protecting the nation’s vaccination & countermeasures program, NOT the injured.
Our government really does not want to compensate those who have been injured. US Department of Justice attorneys who represent our government in the NVICP along with HRSA want to grind compensation programs to a halt or slow trickle. I would assume this being the way for the public to give up on seeking compensation and just accept the risks of vaccination.
Also included in the FOIA response was budgets for staffing and the costs for the use of contractors for clerical duties, manage information system to process and manage work flow.
The budget for HRSA staffing for FY 2022 for 42 Federal Staff and 12 contractors is $5 million. The budget for FY 2023 is for 42 Federal Staff and 20 contractors is $9.5 million. This truly represents how our government values paying staff versus compensating individuals who were injured or have died from a COVID countermeasure.
The government agencies are all part of the Executive Branch of our Federal Government. The White House has shown no indication of providing additional funding, nor have the federal agencies have asked Congress for additional funding.
We can change this. We have to get loud. Very loud. And we have to grow our numbers of people contacting Congress ten fold. Congress can address this but only if we get loud and show up in extremely large numbers.
Keep learning, keep challenging yourself and always, always question authority.
Let’s get busy.
Why are the General Public surprised when they learn that Government's will not adequately Compensate for Vaccine Associated Injuries? . . .
Remember it was 'Government' who initially awarded 'Indemnity' to the Collective Pharmacutical Industry and the Medical personnel tasked with administration back in 1986 under President Ronald Regan. Which Created a ' Free Market - No Liability' for multitude of currently administered 'Vaccines'.
And the Government's accross the Globe push to introduce 'Mandatory Vaccines' along with a 'Vaccine Injury Compensation Programme'.
So how do the various Government Agencies accross the World limit their own 'Liability'? . . . They use 'The Vaccine Injury Table' to adjudicate on potential cases taken against the Government.
And the current 'Vaccine Injury Table' as ammended in 2017 uses very deliberate 'Exclusionary Criteria'.
They 'Exclude' from Compensation Any 'Infant/ Child / Adult' within the general population showing signs of an already established 'Disease Process'.
Cancer Patients, Persons with Genetically associated conditions like Fragile X, Cystic Fibrosis, Retts Syndrome etc, and Infants showing the Residual effects of Birth related Trauma/ Injury. Which is certainly NOT a small percentage of the Population.
But it's a 'Win - Win' situation for all involved in the 'Corrupt' World Of Modern Day Medicine, The Collective Pharmacutical Industry and the Government's tasked with Purchase and Administration of such products. 'PROFIT' driven, at the absolute devestating destruction from accumulative Viral/ Toxin associated neurological infection and accumulative toxic degenerative injury to the most systemically vulnerable members of our 'Collective Society'.
Which in Reality is very Obvious and Blatent 'Discrimination on Grounds Of Disability and Ill- Health'.
Parent of a Birth Injured and subsequently severely Vaccine Injured child who developed Regressive Autism/ Degenerstive Demylinating Neuropathy/SSPE Post MMR Vaccine.
Other budget items of interest, if they exist, would be: 1) amount spent/budgeted for "outreach" (to inform the public about the CICP); and the 2) amount spent/budgeted for vaccine injury analysis/studies.