HRSA says no to COVID specific injury table for the jab.

HRSA decided to use this instead

What does the Smallpox vaccine have in common with any of the COVID-19 jabs?

Absolutely nothing. Different manufacturing process and technology. Some form of a live virus non replicating vaccine versus a Frankenstein mRNA creature. Tis the Halloween season.

In my quest to determine if HRSA has developed or will develop an injury table specific to the COVID-19 jab, I submitted several FOIA’s seeking documentation or materials for an injury table.

I received back from HRSA the following response to this FOIA below.

HRSA states that they do not have any records or documents of any existing injury table specific to the COVID-19 jab nor have any plans to develop one.

Without a specific injury table, then how will the petitions be measured regarding if the jab could have induced or created a specific medical condition? That is what is called a “standard of proof”. Does the petition meet a standard of proof to justify awarding compensation.

A response from HRSA regarding my FOIA asking for a “standard of proof” was received this past week. And to my surprise, HRSA refers to their “standard of proof” that was established in August 2021. The Secretary of HHS in August of 2021 issues a rule to adopt the Smallpox vaccine injury table, from a vaccine that was created nearly 20 years ago. Our federal government was very concerned about biological terrorism after 9/11, it created The Smallpox Emergency Personnel Protection Act of 2003 (SEPPA). Which in part created the Smallpox Vaccine Injury Compensation Program that would provide immunity to vaccine administrators and compensation to those who were injured from the vaccine. More to come in next article about this specific compensation program.

So why did the Secretary of HHS using unbridled authority of The PREP Act, adopting the Smallpox Vaccine Injury Table in August 2021 via The Federal Register as the means to enact policy. Maybe because the rest of the country was focusing on masking policies, many states still had their iron claws wrapped around the throats of its citizens with lockdown policies and parents demanding that schools reopen for their children.

There is no answer from Sec’y of HHS or HRSA on the question of why. Just crickets.

Here is HRSA’s response when I asked for how they are going to measure and decide all of the COVID-19 jab injury petitions in the CICP. The reference to the 34 pages is the announcement in the Federal Register.

An injury table that was created nearly 19 years ago, incorporated into the PREP Act in August 2021 that now will be used for all COVID-19 jab injury or death petitions.

The Smallpox vaccine and the COVID-19 jab are not related by manufacturing process, by design not by any measure. So why judge injuries incurred by the jab using definitions and medical outcomes of a completely different countermeasure?

Maybe they knew if a COVID jab injury table was to be developed, a Pandora’s box would have to be opened (VAERS) and our government does not want that discussion in public.

So know we know. The Smallpox vaccine injury table below shows that allergic reactions and myocarditis are two acceptable injuries according to HRSA. The table also lists encephalopathy and encephalitis. Those injuries also must occur no earlier than 5 days nor greater than 14 days. The definition is actually stricter than the definition used in the NVICP. So why are we dealing with multiple varying definitions for the same injury?

Guess what the medical outcomes of the 3 pending petitions in the CICP are? One anaphylaxis and two myocarditis cases.

In the next few days, I will post a new article about the Smallpox Vaccine Injury Compensation Program that was established in 2003. This is getting so twisted.

Happy Halloween!! Trick or Treat.

Keep learning, keep challenging yourself and always, always question authority.